Chikungunya virus infection in the southernmost state of Brazil was characterised by self-limited transmission (2017-2019) and a larger 2021 outbreak

BACKGROUND Chikungunya is a mosquito-borne virus that has been causing large outbreaks in the Americas since 2014. In Brazil, Asian-Caribbean (AC) and East-Central-South-African (ECSA) genotypes have been detected and lead to large outbreaks in several Brazilian states. In Rio Grande do Sul (RS), the southernmost state of Brazil, the first cases were reported in 2016. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS We employed genome sequencing and epidemiological investigation to characterise the Chikungunya fever (CHIKF) burden in RS between 2017-2021. FINDINGS We detected an increasing CHIKF burden linked to travel associated introductions and communitary transmission of distinct lineages of the ECSA genotype during this period. MAIN CONCLUSIONS Until 2020, CHIKV introductions were most travel associated and transmission was limited. Then, in 2021, the largest outbreak occurred in the state associated with the introduction of a new ECSA lineage. CHIKV outbreaks are likely to occur in the near future due to abundant competent vectors and a susceptible population, exposing more than 11 million inhabitants to an increasing infection risk.

Influenza A(H3N2) infection followed by separate COVID-19 infection / Infección por el virus de la gripe A (H3N2) seguida de infección separada por el virus causante de la COVID-19 / Infecção por influenza A (H3N2) seguida de infecção independente por COVID-19

ABSTRACT This study describes the case of a health professional infected first by influenza virus A(H3N2) and then by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) 11 days later. Respiratory samples and clinical data were collected from the patient and from close contacts. RNA was extracted from samples and reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was used to investigate the viruses. The patient presented with two different illness events: the first was characterized by fever, chest and body pain, prostration and tiredness, which ceased on the ninth day; RT-qPCR was positive only for influenza virus A(H3N2). Eleven days after onset of the first symptoms, the patient presented with sore throat, nasal congestion, coryza, nasal itching, sneezing and coughing, and a second RT-qPCR test was positive only for SARS-CoV-2; in the second event, symptoms lasted for 11 days. SARS-CoV-2 sequencing identified the Omicron BA.1 lineage. Of the patient's contacts, one was coinfected with influenza A(H3N2) and SARS-CoV-2 lineage BA.1.15 and the other two were infected only with SARS-CoV-2, one also with Omicron BA.1.15 and the other with BA.1.1. Our findings reinforce the importance of testing for different viruses in cases of suspected respiratory viral infection during routine epidemiological surveillance because common clinical manifestations of COVID-19 mimic those of other viruses, such as influenza.

RESUMEN Este estudio describe el caso de un profesional de la salud que contrajo la infección primero por el virus de la gripe A (H3N2) y a continuación por el coronavirus 2 del síndrome respiratorio agudo grave (SARS-CoV-2) 11 días después. Se recogieron muestras respiratorias y datos clínicos del paciente y sus contactos cercanos. Se extrajo ARN de muestras y se utilizó la reacción en cadena de la polimerasa cuantitativa con transcripción inversa (RT-qPCR, por su sigla en inglés) para investigar los virus. El paciente presentó dos procesos infecciosos distintos: el primero se caracterizó por fiebre, dolor corporal y torácico, postración y cansancio, que cesó en el noveno día. La prueba mediante RT-qPCR solo fue positiva en el virus de la gripe A (H3N2). Once días después del inicio de los primeros síntomas, el paciente manifestó dolor de garganta, congestión nasal, catarro, picazón nasal, estornudos y tos. Una segunda prueba mediante RT-qPCR solo fue positiva para el SARS-CoV-2 y durante este segundo proceso los síntomas duraron 11 días. La secuenciación del SARS-CoV-2 identificó el linaje ómicron BA.1. De los contactos del paciente, uno presentaba una coinfección por el virus de la gripe A (H3N2) y el linaje BA.1.15 del SARS-COV-2, y los otros dos presentaban infecciones únicamente por SARS-CoV-2, uno también del linaje ómicron BA.1.15 y el otro de BA.1.1. Estos hallazgos refuerzan la importancia de realizar pruebas para detectar diferentes virus en casos de sospecha de infección viral respiratoria durante la vigilancia epidemiológica de rutina porque las manifestaciones clínicas comunes de COVID-19 son similares a las de otros virus, como en el caso de la gripe.

RESUMO Este estudo descreve o caso de uma profissional de saúde infectada primeiro pelo vírus influenza A (H3N2) e, 11 dias depois, pelo coronavírus da síndrome respiratória aguda grave 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Amostras respiratórias e dados clínicos foram coletados da paciente e de contatos próximos. RNA foi extraído das amostras, e o método de reação em cadeia da polimerase via transcriptase reversa quantitativa (RT-qPCR) foi utilizado para investigar os vírus. A paciente apresentou dois quadros clínicos distintos. O primeiro foi caracterizado por febre, dor no peito e no corpo, prostração e fadiga, que cessou no nono dia. A RT-qPCR foi positiva apenas para o vírus da influenza A (H3N2). Onze dias após o início dos primeiros sintomas, a paciente apresentou dor de garganta, congestão nasal, coriza, prurido nasal, espirros e tosse. Um segundo teste de RT-qPCR foi positivo apenas para SARS-CoV-2. No segundo evento, os sintomas duraram 11 dias. O sequenciamento do SARS-CoV-2 identificou a cepa Ômicron BA.1. Dentre os contatos da paciente, um teve coinfeção por influenza A (H3N2) e SARS-COV-2 (cepa BA.1.15), e os outros dois foram infectados apenas por SARS-CoV-2 (um também pela cepa Ômicron BA.1.15 e o outro pela BA.1.1). Nossos achados reforçam a importância de testes para a detecção de diferentes vírus em casos de suspeita de infecção viral respiratória durante a vigilância epidemiológica de rotina, visto que as manifestações clínicas comuns da COVID-19 imitam as de outros vírus, como o vírus influenza.

SARS-CoV-2 laboratory surveillance during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in southern Brazil

ABSTRACT Background: Brazil has one of the highest numbers of COVID-19 cases and deaths. Rio Grande do Sul (RS) in southern Brazil is one of the leading states in terms of case numbers. As part of the national public health network, the State Central Laboratory (LACEN-RS) changed its routine in 2020 to focus on the diagnosis of COVID-19. This study evaluated the laboratory surveillance of COVID-19 suspected cases analyzed at the LACEN-RS in 2020. Methods: Viral detection was performed using RT-qPCR in samples from patients with respiratory infection who met the study criteria. Viral RNA was isolated using commercial manual kits or automated extractors, and SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR was performed using the Bio-Manguinhos/Rio de Janeiro, IBMP/Paraná, or Allplex 2019-nCoV assay. In total, 360 representative SARS-CoV-2 samples were sequenced using the Illumina platform. Results: In total, 31,197 of 107,578 (positivity rate = 29%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. The number of RT-qPCR tests performed per month followed the COVID-19 epidemic curve observed for the state, with peaks in July-August and December. Females accounted for 63% of the samples, whereas the positivity rate was higher among males (33.1% males vs. 26.5% females). The positivity rate was higher in adults aged 50-79 years compared to the overall positivity rate. The majority of cases were observed in the capital, Porto Alegre, and the metropolitan region. Ten distinct lineages were identified, with B.1.1.28, B.1.1.33, and P.2 being the most frequent. Conclusions: Here, we describe laboratory surveillance of COVID-19 to identify priorities for epidemiological surveillance actions in RS.

Epidemiological investigation reveals local transmission of SARS-CoV-2 lineage P. 1 in Southern Brazil / Investigação epidemiológica revela transmissão local da variante P. 1 do SARS-CoV-2 no Sul do Brasil / Una investigación epidemiológica revela la transmisión local de la variante P. 1 del SARS-CoV-2 en el sur de Brasil

Since its detection in December of 2020, the SARS-CoV2 lineage P.1, descendent of B.1.1.28 lineage, has been identified in several places in Brazil and abroad. This Variant of Concern was considered highly prevalent in Northern Brazil and now is rapidly widening its geographical range. Here, we present epidemiological and genomic information of the first case of P1 lineage in Rio Grande do Sul state, in a patient without reported travel history and a tracked transmission chain. These findings occurred in a tourist destination representing an important hub receiving tourists from diverse places.(AU)

Desde a sua detecção em dezembro de 2020, a linhagem P.1 do SARS-CoV2, descendente da linhagem B.1.1.28, foi identificada em diversos locais no Brasil e no mundo. Essa variante de preocupação era considerada altamente frequente no Norte do Brasil e agora está ampliando rapidamente sua distribuição geográfica. Aqui, apresentamos informações epidemiológicas e genômicas do primeiro caso da linhagem P.1 no Rio Grande do Sul em um paciente sem histórico de viagens relatado e com cadeia de transmissão identificada. Esses achados ocorreram em um destino turístico que representa um importante pólo de recepção de turistas de diversas localidades.(AU)

Desde su detección en diciembre de 2020, del linaje P.1 del SARS-CoV2, derivada de la B.1.1.28, hay sido ampliamente identificada en Brasil y en todo el mundo. Esta variante preocupante es muy frecuente en el norte de Brasil y ahora está ampliando rápidamente su distribución geográfica. Aquí, presentamos información epidemiológica y genómica del primer caso de P.1 en Rio Grande do Sul en un paciente sin antecedentes de viaje y con una cadena de transmisión identificada. Estos datos se han obtenido en un destino turístico que representa un importante centro de acogida de turistas de diferentes lugares.(AU)

Clinical, laboratorial and radiographic predictors of Bordetella pertussis infection / Preditores clínicos, laboratoriais e radiográficos para infecção por Bordetella pertussis

OBJECTIVE: To identify clinical, laboratorial and radiographic predictors for Bordetella pertussis infection. METHODS: This was a retrospective study, which analyzed medical records of all patients submitted to a molecular dignosis (qPCR) for B. pertussis from September 2011 to January 2013. Clinical and laboratorial data were reviewed, including information about age, sex, signs/symptoms, length of hospitalization, blood cell counts, imaging findings, coinfection with other respiratory pathogens and clinical outcome. RESULTS: 222 cases were revised. Of these, 72.5% had proven pertussis, and 60.9% were under 1 year old. In patients aging up to six months, independent predictors for B. pertussis infection were (OR 8.0, CI 95% 1.8-36.3; p=0.007) and lymphocyte count >104/µL (OR 10.0, CI 95% 1.8-54.5; p=0.008). No independent predictors of B. pertussis infection could be determined for patients older than six months. Co-infection was found in 21.4% of patients, of which 72.7% were up to six months of age. Adenovirus was the most common agent (40.9%). In these patients, we were not able to identify any clinical features to detect patients presenting with a respiratory co-infection, even though longer hospital stay was observed in patients with co-infections (12 vs. 6 days; p=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Cyanosis and lymphocytosis are independent predictors for pertussis in children up to 6 months old...

OBJETIVO: Identificar preditores clínicos, laboratoriais e radiológicos da infecção por Bordetella pertussis. MÉTODOS: Trabalho retrospectivo, com análise de prontuários clínicos de todos os indivíduos submetidos ao diagnóstico molecular (qPCR) para B. pertussis de setembro de 2011 à janeiro de 2013. Foram revistos dados clínicos e laboratoriais, incluindo informações sobre idade, sexo, sinais/sintomas, tempo de hospitalização, contagens de células sanguíneas, exames de imagem, co-infecção com outros patógenos respiratórios, e evolução clínica. RESULTADOS: 222 casos foram revistos, do quais 72,5% tinham coqueluche confirmada, sendo 60,9% menores de um ano de idade. Foram observados preditores independentes para B. pertussis em pacientes com menos de seis meses de idade. Nesses casos, os preditores identificados foram cianose (OR 8,0; CI 95% 1,8-36,3; p=0,007) e contagem de linfócitos >104/µL (OR 10,0, CI 95% 1,8-54,5; p=0,008). Preditores de coqueluche não puderam ser determinados para crianças maiores de 6 meses de idade. Coinfecção foi encontrada em 21,4% dos pacientes, dos quais 72,7% tinham até seis meses de idade, sendo que o adenovírus foi o agente mais comum (40,9%). Nesses indivíduos, não foram observadas características clíncias capazes de distinguir pacientes com co-infecção, porém foi verificado um maior tempo de internação hospitalar nos pacientes com mais de um agente infeccioso detectado (12 vs. 6 dias; p=0,009). CONCLUSÕES: Cianose e linfocitose são preditores independentes para coqueluche em crianças com até seis meses de idade...